Writ petitions filed by Kamlabai Motilal Pande were disposed of. The Court held that the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy available and thus the writ petitions are not entertained.
The writ petitions are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4501.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4501 OF 2012
Kamlabai Motilal Pande
...PETITIONER.
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others.
...RESPONDENTS.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.4500 OF 2012
Kamlabai Motilal Pande
...PETITIONER.
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others.
...RESPONDENTS.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.4498 OF 2012
Kamlabai Motilal Pande
...PETITIONER.
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others.
...RESPONDENTS.
wp4501.12
2
...
Shri.A.P. Bhandari Advocate for Petitioner.
Smt.A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for Respondent
No.1.
Shri.D.B. Thoke Advocate for Respondent No.2.
...
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL AND
M.T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2012.
PER COURT :
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.In the facts of the case, we observe that
the Petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy.
The Petitioner may avail of the same. All issues
are kept open. In view of the availability of
alternate remedy, the Writ Petitions are disposed
of.
[M.T. JOSHI, J.] [NARESH H. PATIL, J.]
asb/SEPT12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions are maintainable in view of the availability of alternate efficacious remedy.
Kamlabai Motilal Pande
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court