Petition challenging the Ek Saal Lavani basis order declared infructuous due to passage of time without interim relief and dismissed.
Petition dismissed; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3329 OF 1992
Maroti s/o Manikrao Yeote
.. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
& others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. M.G. Biradar, advocate holding for Mr. V.G. Sakolkar, advocate for petitioner.
Mr. P.P. More, AGP for State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE, J. DATE : 3rd May, 2012.
ORAL JUDGMENT :
the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad. The
question involved in the matter is in respect of putting the lands on ‘Ek Saal
Lavani’ basis in the year 1986-1987. At the time of granting rule, no interim
relief is granted by this Court. By passage of time, the petition is rendered
2
infructuous. Petition therefore stands dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs.
( R. M. BORDE )
JUDGE
dyb
Maroti s/o Manikrao Yeote
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. BORDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
