The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition to exhaust the alternate remedy available under Section 10A of The Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 regarding an assessment order.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition to avail the alternate remedy under Section 10A of The Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-3159-12
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3159 OF 2012
Jitendra Panchal ..Petitioner
versus
Collector, Thane District & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. Leroy Collaco for Petitioner. Mr. S. K. Shinde - Government Pleader for State.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
21 August 2012
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the State.
1/2
WP-3159-12
skc
the respondents for the said period only. The learned Government Pleader has submitted that the assessment order came to be passed under sub section 4(2)(b) of The Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923 and therefore there is an alternate remedy available to the petitioner against this assessment order under Section 10A of the Act.
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Chandka
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to exhaust the alternate remedy under Section 10A of The Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jitendra Panchal
Collector, Thane District & Ors.
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
