Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition while keeping issues open. The court allowed withdrawal, discharged the rule, and continued an interim order for two weeks.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn; issues kept open; interim order continued for two weeks; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-6733-06
skc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6733 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 965 OF 2012
Vijaykumar Gabriel Appadore & Ors. versus
..Petitioners
Col. Micky Oberoi & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. S. S. Kulkarni for Petitioners.
Col. Micky Oberoi – Respondent No.1 present in person. Mr. R. P. Behare for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. V. S. Gokhale - Assistant Government Pleader for State.
CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
21 August 2012
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent no. 1 in person, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the State.
and in view of the communication dated 9.1.2007 seeks permission to
1/2
WP-6733-06
skc
withdraw the present writ petition and prayed that the issues raised in the present petition may kindly be kept open.
(SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
Chandka
2/2
Vijaykumar Gabriel Appadore & Ors.
Col. Micky Oberoi
D. D. Sinha
Smt. V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
