The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a mandate to register an offence, relying on Sakiri Vasu to hold that remedies under the CrPC are available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-3153.12
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3153 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Rahul s. Kate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & S.S. SHINDE, JJ DATE : 5TH DECEMBER, 2012
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The prayer in this Petition is for seeking a writ of mandamus directing registration of the offence against certain persons.
in the case of Sakiri Vasu v State of Uttar Pradesh & Others [(2008)2 SCC 409], we cannot entertain this Petition as the petitioner has remedies available under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. We,
2
wp-3153.12
ash
therefore, dispose of this Petition by keeping those remedies of the Petitioner open. All contentions
raised by the Petitioner are kept open.
( S.S. SHINDE, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court can entertain a writ petition seeking registration of an offence when the petitioner has remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu v State of Uttar Pradesh & OthersRelied on¶11
Sakiri Vasu v State of Uttar Pradesh & Others [(2008)2 SCC 409] · Who else cites this
Petitioner
State
A.S. OKA
S.S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court