Ananta Nathu Dahibhate v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew criminal writ petition challenging life sentence on grounds of premature filing; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-1740.12
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1740 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri N.N. Gawankar for the Petitioner. Mrs. A.S. Pai, APP for the State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & S.S. SHINDE, JJ DATE : 5TH DECEMBER, 2012
P.C.:
. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner pointed out that the life sentence of the Petitioner will start on 8th December, 2003 and, therefore, the present Petition is premature. Only on this ground, he seeks permission to withdraw the Petition. Accordingly, we dismiss the Petition as withdrawn. It will be open for the Petitioner to raise all the contentions at the appropriate stage.
Ash
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court