A writ petition remained outstanding due to the petitioner's absence from hearings on two occasions. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution, thereby disposing of associated civil applications.
Writ Petition dismissed; Civil Applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
3122-92-wp.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3122 OF 1992
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NOS.3527 OF 1993 AND 8019 OF 2004
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order
None present
CORAM : R.M.BORDE, J. DATE : MAY 4, 2012
P.C.
This petition was called out yesterday, and none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The same was kept for hearing today. Today also, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Writ Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
2] In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Civil Application Nos.3527 of 1993 and 8019 of 2004 do not survive and the same stand disposed of.
[R.M.BORDE, J.]
kbp/
R.M.Borde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court