Disposed

M/S Ansh Restaurant Thr. Its Proprietor Anand S/O Udaynarayan Singh v. the State of Mah. Department of State Excise Thr. Its Secretary and Anr.

Bombay HC23 Jan 2012WP/312/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two writ petitions, the High Court at Nagpur observed that the Licensing Authority delayed deciding on the petitioners' liquor licence applications. The court directed the Authority to take a final decision within four weeks and disposed of the matters.

What did the court decide?

Directs the Licensing Authority to take a final decision on the pending liquor licence applications within four weeks.

M/S Ansh Restaurant Thr. Its Proprietor Anand S/O… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2012)

¶1

¶2

2301wp312.12.odt

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT NAGPUR.

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.312 of 2012. M/s Ansh Restautant .vs..State of Mah. and ors.

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.313 of 2012.

¶7

M/s Vaibhav Saoji Restautant .vs..State of Mah. and ors.

¶8

=-=-==-=-=---=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Court's or Judges Order Coram appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.

¶10

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

¶11

Mr. S.G.Jagtap,Adv. for the petitioner.

¶12

Ms Tajwar Khan AGP for the respondents.

¶13

 C ORAM: P.B.MAJMUDAR AND

¶14

 A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.

¶15

DATED:23rd JANUARY, 2012.

¶16

The grievance of the petitioner in each of the petitions is that the Licensing Authority has not taken any decision on the application of the petitioner regarding FL-III License i.e. Liquor Licence.

¶17

If an application of the applicant/petitioner is pending still, the Licensing Authority to take a final decision in this behalf, according to law, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶18

The learned AGP to communicate this order to the Licensing Authority.

¶19

With the above direction, writ petition is disposed of.

¶20

Steno copy of this order may be furnished to the parties.

JUDGE

JUDGE.

chute

2301wp312.12.odt 2

M/S Ansh Restaurant Thr. Its Proprietor Anand S/O Udaynarayan Singh v. the State of Mah. Department of State Excise Thr. Its Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Ansh Restaurant Thr. Its Proprietor Anand S/O Udaynarayan Singh v. the State of Mah. Department of State Excise Thr. Its Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swapnil S/O Pradeep Deshpande Vs Rergistrar (Controller of Examination and in Charge of Revaluation) R.T.M.N.U.

Union of India Thr. Executive Engineer (Electrical) Nagpur Central Electrical Division Vs Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur

Komal Rajendra Agrawal Nagpur Vs the Chairman, v R C E, Nagpur and 3 Others.

M/S Royal Hotel and Restaurant, through Its Partner Shri Anand S/O Udaynarayan Singh and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra, Department of State Excise and Another

M/S Vaibhav Saoji Restaurant Thr. Its Proprietor Ritesh S/O Narayanrao Lakkewar Vs the State of Mah. Deptt. of State Excise Thr. Its Secretary and Anr.

Divakar S/O Gulab Pendam Vs Honourable State Election Commissioner State Election Commission and 3 Ors.