Dismissed
Hukumatlal Ravalmal Sindhi v. Tulsabai Ramdas Pingale
Bombay HCWP/292/1992
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-292-92.odt
KBP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.292 OF 1992
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.V.T.Choudhary, advocate for respondent sole.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : JANUARY 30, 2012
P.C.
Rule was issued on 14th February, 1992. The
matter is not attended by learned counsel for the petitioner on 7th January, 2010, 14th December, 2010,
6th January, 2012 and today.
2] Mr.Choudhary, learned counsel for the respondent – landlord submits, his client has now received the possession of the disputed property. His client has also not contacted him inspite of several communications.
3] In the above fact situation, Writ Petition is disposed of. Rule discharged.
[K.U.CHANDIWAL, J .]
kbp/
Writ Petitioner
Respondent
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court