None present for the petitioner; matter adjourned multiple times; writ petition dismissed and rule discharged due to absence.
Rule discharged; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KBP1 wp-135-92.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.135 OF 1992
Dadarao s/o.Tuljiram Yedke and ors. Vs
Trimbak s/o.Talya Mali and ors.
..Petitioners
..Respondents
None present.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : JANUARY 30, 2012
P.C.:
On 19th January, 2012 the matter was called out, none remained present for the petitioner. It was adjourned to 23rd January, 2012 and then today. Today also none appears for the petitioner. Rule was issued on 4th February, 1992. Writ Petition is dismissed. Rule discharged.
[K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.]
kbp/
Dadarao s/o.Tuljiram Yedke and ors.
Trimbak s/o.Talya Mali and ors.
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court