Petitioner in person submitted compliance with order and desired withdrawal of contempt petition. Court permitted withdrawal and disposed of petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cp-56-12.odt
KBP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.56 OF 2012
IN
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.271 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Petitioner present in person
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J. DATE : JANUARY 30, 2012
P.C.
Heard petitioner in person. He submits the
order is complied with and consequently, he desires to withdraw the Contempt Petition No.56 of 2012.
Permitted, disposed of.
[K.U.CHANDIWAL, J .]
kbp/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court