This writ petition directed the respondent to decide a mining lease renewal application within a time frame. The respondents undertook to comply by a specified date in accordance with law, leading to the disposal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 256 OF 2012
MR. HARESH MELWANI TRADING IN THE NAME & STYLE OF M/S H L NATHURMAL ... Petitioner Versus
THE DIRECTOR MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT. OF GOA AND ANR.,
... Respondents
Mr. Agnelo F. Diniz, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Ms. P. Sawant, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:2nd April, 2012
P.C.:-
Heard Mr. Diniz, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Advocate General for the respondents.
A. P. LAVANDE, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
ssm.
MR. HARESH MELWANI TRADING IN THE NAME & STYLE OF M/S H L NATHURMAL
THE DIRECTOR MINES AND GEOLOGY, GOVT. OF GOA AND ANR.
A. P. LAVANDE
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
