On withdrawal of notice by respondent No. 1, the cause of action survives and the petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 254 OF 2012
MR. SHABBAR KHAN & 5 ORS., REP. BY POA SHRI SHADIQ SHAIKH Versus THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST, GOVT. OF GOA AND 2 ORS.,
... Petitioner
... Respondents
Mr. S. G. Bhobe, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M. Salkar, Government Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. M. S. Sonak, Advocate for respondent No.3.
Coram:A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:2nd April, 2012
P.C.:-
Mr. Salkar, learned Government Advocate waives notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 and Mr. Sonak appears on behalf of respondent No.3.
A. P. LAVANDE, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
ssm.
MR. SHABBAR KHAN & 5 ORS.
THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST, GOVT. OF GOA AND 2 ORS.
A. P. LAVANDE
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
