The court held that as the externment period had expired in October 2010, no order survived for consideration and disposed of the writ petition, explicitly leaving questions open.
Examination ended as external order had expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2182.10
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2182 OF 2010
Deepak Hareshwar Sawant ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Santosh Chari for Petitioner.
Mr.J.P.Yagnik, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 18, 2012.
P.C.
October, 2010, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. The same is disposed of. All questions raised in this petition are left open.
( R.Y.GANOO, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
1/1
SQ Pathan
Deepak Hareshwar Sawant
The State of Maharashtra
A.M.KHANWILKAR
R.Y.GANOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
