In a criminal writ petition, the court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty as prayed, leaving all questions open as the charge-sheet was already filed.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed; all questions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2724.12
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2724 OF 2012
Rahul Tukaram Patil ...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr.Vijay Killedar for Petitioner.
Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND R.Y.GANOO, JJ. DATED:- SEPTEMBER 17, 2012.
P.C.
filed. In that case, the petitioner is free to pursue the other remedy.
( R.Y.GANOO, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
1/1
SQ Pathan
Rahul Tukaram Patil
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Khanwilkar
R.Y. Ganoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
