The High Court at Nagpur allowed the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 2020 of 2012 and disposed of the matter based on the petitioner's counsel's instruction to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
1308wp2020.12.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2020 OF 2012
(Mukinda Mahadeorao Raut Vs. The Divisional Commissioner & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. V. S. Kothale, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. K. S. Joshi, A.G.P. for respondent No.1. Mr. J. B. Kasat, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &
M. T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 13 AUGUST, 2012
Learned Counsel for the petitioner
states that the petitioner has given instruction for
withdrawal of the Writ Petition.
In view of the statement, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
wwl
Mukinda Mahadeorao Raut
The Divisional Commissioner & others
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
M. T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
