Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition against the State Government's rejection of a proposal to open a new educational institution, retaining liberty to challenge the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1308wp1956.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1956 OF 2012
Abhyudaya Educity Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ano.
........................................................................................................................................................................ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................................................
Shri Anand Parchure Adv for petitioner. Shri D. P. Thakre AGP respondent 1. Shri B. G. Kulkarni Adv for respondent 2.
CORAM: S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M . T. JOSHI JJ. DATED: 13th AUGUST, 2012.
Learned AGP has placed on record a communication stated
to be dated 9th August 2012 addressed to the Secretary of the petitioner conveying decision of the State Government and particularly rejection of
the proposal forwarded for opening of a new institution.
Shri Parchure learned counsel, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to challenge this communication as also all prior communications and seek appropriate relief by filing a fresh petition.
Leave to withdraw with liberty as prayed for is granted. All contentions of parties are kept open.
JUDGE
JUDGE
1308wp1956.12
2
svk
Abhyudaya Educity
State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmadhikari
M. T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
