Petition challenging an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal was dismissed. The High Court held no case was made out for interference.
The writ petition was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1935 OF 2012
(Rama Santoba Avchar vs. The State)
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's
orders or directions
and the Registrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Coram: B. R. Gavai, and
Sunil P. Deshmukh, JJ.
Date: 05.03.2012
Shri J.M. Murkute, Advocate, for petitioner. Shri K.G. Patil, AG.P. for the Respondents.
(Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.)
pnd/wp-1935.12
Rama Santoba Avchar
The State
B. R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court