This bench directed the respondent to dispose of Change Report No.369/2008 within one year.
The petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to consider and decide Change Report No.369/2008 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP 1793/12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1793/2012
Suryabhan Shankarrao Pote V/s The State & another.
_______________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
Shri S.K. Shinde, Advocate h/f Shri K.D. Bade Patil, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri S.K. Kadam, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 2.
CORAM: B.R. GAVAI & SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
Date: 02.03.2012
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petition has been filed for direction
to the respondent no.2 to dispose of the Change Report No.369/2008 within a stipulated period.
The petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.2 to consider and decide the aforesaid change report as
WP 1793/12
2
expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of one year from today.
(Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 02.03.2012 ndk/c231210
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent-2 should be directed to dispose of the Change Report No.369/2008 expeditiously.
Suryabhan Shankarrao Pote
The State
B.R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
