Petitioner alleged writ petition became infructuous as his representation was already decided adversely. The court disposed of the petition leaving all questions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vss
wp.1506.2012.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.1506 OF 2012
Shri Shashikant Pundalik Gangurde ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Commissioner Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporatin Navi Mumbai & anr. .... Respondents
Mr.Sandesh Patil for the Petitioner Mr.A.A. Garge for the Respondent No.1 Ms.S.S. Bhende, AGP, for Resp. No.2
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & N.M. JAMDAR, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 19, 2012
P.C.:
petition has become infructuous as the representation made by the petitioner has already been decided. If this decision is adverse to the petitioner, he is free to challenge the same before appropriate forum as may be advised.
(N.M. JAMDAR, J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.)
1 of 1
Shri Shashikant Pundalik Gangurde
The Commissioner Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporatin Navi Mumbai
anr.
A.M. KHANWILKAR
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
