This is a one-line order where the court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition after counsel stated the petitioner was not interested in pursuing it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vss
wp.1388.2012.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.1388 OF 2012
N.G. Heritage Cooperative Hsg. Society Ltd. ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Dy. Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors.
.... Respondents
Mr.R.D. Suryavanshi for the Petitioner Ms.S.S. Bhende, AGP, for Responents
CORAM: A.M. KHANWILKAR & N.M. JAMDAR, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 15, 2012
P.C.:
Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions states that the
petitioner is not interested in pursuing this petition. Hence, the petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
(N.M. JAMDAR, J.) (A.M. KHANWILKAR,J.)
1 of 1
N.G. Heritage Cooperative Hsg. Society Ltd.
The Dy. Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors.
A.M. KHANWILKAR
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
