Petitioner filed Writ Petition seeking direction to decide Review Petition filed by him. Court passed order directing Respondent No.2 to decide Review Application within four months from today.
Direction to decide Review Application No.384 of 2008 within four months from today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.1305/2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1305 OF 2012
Dnyaneshwar Vishnu Khedkar ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & anr.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr P.B. Gapat, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr V.D. Godbharle, A.G.P. for respondents
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : 8th February, 2012
PER COURT :
The limited relief claimed in the petition is for a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the Review Petition filed by the present petitioner.
(SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) (B.R. GAVAI, J.)
amj/wp1305.12
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ can be issued directing a respondent to decide a review application within a specified time.
Whether Directions under Writ Jurisdiction can be issued for expeditious disposal of Review Petition.
Whether Article 226 of the Constitution can be invoked to direct the decision of a Review Petition within four months.
Dnyaneshwar Vishnu Khedkar
The State of Mah.
B.R. GAVAI
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
