Allowed
Pradeep Sitaram Rajput v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Bombay HCCA/401/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in WP 2935/05 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CA 401/12 in WP 2935/05
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.401/2012 Pradip Sitaram Rajput V/s The State & others. IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2935/2005
|
Office Notes, Office
||_________________
|
|---|---|
|Memoranda of Coram,
|
appearances, Court's
||
Court's or Judge's orders
|
|orders or directions
|||
|and Registrar's orders
|||
Shri U.R. Awate, Advocate h/f Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for applicant.
Shri K.M, Suryawanshi, AGP for respondent nos.1 & 3.
CORAM: B.R. GAVAI &
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
Date: 08.02.2012
Heard learned counsel for the
respective parties.
Civil application is allowed.
Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.
(Sunil P. Deshmukh, J.) (B.R. Gavai, J.) Dt/- 08.02.2012 ndk/c821211
Pradip Sitaram Rajput
The State
B.R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court