The High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the executing court at Beed to decide the petitioner's amendment application in LARDNo. 465 of 2006 with a hearing, to be concluded within six months.
Directed the Executing Court at Beed to dispose of the LARDNo. 465/2006 amendment application with hearing within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 596 OF 2012 "Pralhad Pandurang Bnandare Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others."
Office Notes, Office Court's or Judge's orders Memoranda of Coram or directions and Registrar's orders. appearances, Court's Orders
1
Mr. S.G. Jadhavar,Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondent Nos.
CORAM :- B.R. GAVAI &
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE :- 7TH FEBRUARY, 2012.
PER COURT :-
1] The limited relief claimed in the petition is for a direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the application filed by the petitioner for amendment in LARDNo. 465 of 2006.
2] Writ petition is disposed of directing the Executing Court at Beed to dispose of the aforesaid proceedings, in accordance with law, after granting an opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within 6 months from today.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH,J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.]
grt/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of by directing the executing court to decide the amendment application with opportunity of hearing.
Pralhad Pandurang Bnandare
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
