The High Court of Judicature at Bombay held that a revision application does not survive because a preceding application seeking condonation of delay was already dismissed. The matter was disposed of without further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
REVN 387.12.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVN. APPLICATION NO. 387 OF 2012
Mr. Rajkumar B. Agarwal.
... Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
... Respondents.
None for the Applicant. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for the State.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 26th NOVEMBER 2012.
P.C. :-
Since Criminal Application No.390 of 2009 seeking condonation of delay is already dismissed on 28.08.2009, the Revision Application does not survive. Disposed of.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)
Mr. Rajkumar B. Agarwal
The State of Maharashtra
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
