The criminal appeal was dismissed as the deceased appellant's advocate was absent. The matter had been adjourned earlier on the appearance of the appellant's mother, Shahnaz, but nobody was present on the current date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apeal182-11.sxw
1/1
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 182 OF 2011
Jahid @ Sonu Mehboob Shaikh. …Appellant versus State of Maharashtra ...Respondents ---
None for Applicant.
Mrs.A.A.Mane, APP for State.
CORAM : K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 23rd November, 2012
P.C. :
Mr.S.Kotian, Advocate for the deceased appellant called, absent. On earlier date, Smt.Shehnaz claiming to be mother of Jahid @ Sonu Mehboob Shaikh appeared and got the matter adjourned to this date. Nobody present. Appeal is, consequently, dismissed.
(K.U.CHANDIWAL, J.)
Jahid @ Sonu Mehboob Shaikh
State of Maharashtra
K.U.CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
