Single-judge High Court allowed a criminal appeal challenging an interim maintenance award. The court condoned a 93-day filing delay as explained and disposed of the application.
Delay of 93 days condoned; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPR 154.12.sxw
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 154 OF 2012 IN CRI. REVN. APPLICATION (St.) NO. 164 OF 2012
Mrs. Laxmi K. Advani.
... Applicant.
V/s.
Mr. Kewal N. Advani & Anr.
... Respondents.
Ms. Gauri Salgaonkar i/b. Mr. A.L. Gore for the Applicant. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for the State.
CORAM : K.U. CHANDIWAL, J.
DATED : 26th NOVEMBER 2012.
P.C. :-
Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant. There is delay of 93 days in filing application. Award of maintenance at interim stage at the rate of Rs.13,000/- per month is questioned.
(K.U. CHANDIWAL,J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 93 days in filing the maintenance application is sufficient ground to condone the same?
Whether an interim maintenance award challenged at this stage should be quashed?
Mrs. Laxmi K. Advani
Mr. Kewal N. Advani & Anr.
K.U. CHANDIWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
