High Court, Criminal Revision Application, Bombay. Court disposed of the revision as infructuous, but directed the lower Magistrate to hear parties before issuing process.
Criminal revision application disposed of; Magistrate directed to hear parties before issuing process.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
REVN 274.10
SSK/937
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2010
Shri Kantibhai Jitmal Jain ....Applicant Versus Majaj Mukhtar Dolare & ors. ...Respondents
Mr. S. V. Marwadi i/b. Mr. V. V. Katti, advocate for the applicant. Mr. Mohite i/b. Mr. S. H. Joshi, advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3. Mrs. Poonam P. Bhosale, APP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J. DATED : 1st March, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
REVN 274.10
SSK/937 2
counsel agree that the revision is rendered infructuous. The criminal revision application is, therefore, disposed of.
3. Learned Magistrate, however, is directed to hear the applicant (complainant) and respondent Nos.1 to 3 (accused) before issuing any order.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Shri Kantibhai Jitmal Jain
Majaj Mukhtar Dolare & ors.
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
