Petitioner challenged a caste validity certificate matter. Court found the application survived scrutiny, rendering the petition infructuous without substantive legal analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SSK/901
WP/570.12
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 570 OF 2012
Bharati Sachin Gurav ....Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Prashant S. Bhavake, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V. D. Patil, Government Pleader for the State.
CORAM : MOHIT S SHAH, C.J. & RANJIT MORE, J. DATED :29th February, 2012.
P.C.:
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner’s application for caste validity certificate was accepted by the Special Scrutiny Committee. In view of the above, this petition does not survive and is disposed of, as infructuous.
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Bharati Sachin Gurav
The State of Maharashtra
Mohit S Shah
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
