Disposed
Sohrab Rustom Framjee v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPL/877/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
to 880.11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SSK/906
apl 877 to 880.11
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NOS. 877, 878, 879 & 880 OF 2011
Sohrab Rustom Framjee ....Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & anr. ...Respondents.
...Respondents.
Mr. P. Rajan i/b. T. J. Pandian, advocate for the applicant. Mr. D. P. Adsule, APP for the State.
Ms. Nilam Jadhav i/b. Jurisconsultus, advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE, J.
DATED : 1st March, 2012.
P.C.:
The applicant is the original accused No.8 in separate complaints filed by respondent No.2- SICOM Ltd. in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court at Esplanade, Mumbai. The complaints are filed under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
the respondent No.2 has already applied for dropping of the said proceedings as against the present applicant/original accused No.8. The statement is accepted.
SSK/906
apl 877 to 880.11
2
applications are, accordingly, disposed of.
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Sohrab Rustom Framjee
The State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court