This group order by Letters Patent Appeal disposed of over 50 review applications filed by the appellant Bajaj Auto Limited, rejecting them by adopting the reasoning of a previous rejected review application.
Review applications dismissed based on prevailing reasoning in a related order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Review Application Stamp No.33365 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.302 of 2011 In Writ Petition No.5409 of 2005
Bajaj Auto Limited.
.. Applicant.
Versus
Bhausaheb Gopinath Janadhar And Others.
.. Respondents.
With
Review Application Stamp No.33373 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.303 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33641 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.304 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33644 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.305 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33646 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.306 of 2011
With
2 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group) Review Application Stamp No.33652 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.307 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33649 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.308 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33657 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.309 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33622 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.310 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33585 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.311 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33357 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.312 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33371 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.313 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33375 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.314 of 2011
3 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group)
With
Review Application Stamp No.33369 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.315 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33597 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.316 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33592 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.317 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33589 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.318 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33355 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.319 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33578 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.320 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33553 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.321 of 2011
4 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group)
With
Review Application Stamp No.33377 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.322 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33587 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.323 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33567 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.324 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33572 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.325 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33356 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.326 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33362 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.327 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33546 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.328 of 2011
With
5 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group)
Review Application Stamp No.33624 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.329 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33627 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.330 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33630 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.331 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33639 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.332 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33635 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.333 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33633 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.334 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33602 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.335 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33607 of 2011 In
6 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group) Letters Patent Appeal No.336 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33605 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.337 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33600 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.338 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33594 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.339 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33514 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.340 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33360 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.341 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33366 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.342 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33429 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.343 of 2011
With
7 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group)
Review Application Stamp No.33413 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.344 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33387 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.345 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33389 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.346 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33397 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.347 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33580 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.348 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33582 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.349 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33611 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.350 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33613 of 2011 In
8 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group) Letters Patent Appeal No.351 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33617 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.370 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33615 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.352 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33416 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.353 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33408 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.354 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33403 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.355 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33399 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.356 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33405 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.357 of 2011
9 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group)
With
Review Application Stamp No.33401 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.358 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33410 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.359 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33654 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.360 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33538 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.361 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33570 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.362 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33564 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.363 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33575 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.364 of 2011
With
10 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group)
Review Application Stamp No.33544 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.365 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33548 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.366 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33551 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.367 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33542 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.368 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33619 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.369 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33511 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.371 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33561 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.372 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33557 of 2011
11 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group) In Letters Patent Appeal No.373 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33380 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.374 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33421 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.375 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33382 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.376 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33385 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.377 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33424 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.378 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33412 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.379 of 2011
With
Review Application Stamp No.33419 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.380 of 2011
12 RAST 33365 of 2011 (group)
Shri. R.V. Ghuge, Advocate for applicant.
Shri. U.R. Awate, Advocate, holding for Shri. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for respondents.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE 19th JANUARY 2012
PER COURT :
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.)
rsl
Bajaj Auto Limited
Bhausaheb Gopinath Janadhar And Others
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
