Court disposed of nineteen batches of civil applications challenging Letters Patent Appeals and review applications regarding stamp duty/fees. Court condoned the delay in filing review applications and disposed of all pending condonation petitions.
All civil applications for condonation of delay were allowed and the matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Civil Application No.587 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33365 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.302 of 2011 In Writ Petition No.5409 of 2005
Bajaj Auto Limited.
.. Applicant.
Versus
Bhausaheb Gopinath Janadhar And Others. .. Respondents.
With
Civil Application No.588 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33373 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.303 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.589 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33641 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.304 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.590 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33644 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.305 of 2011
2 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group)
With
Civil Application No.591 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33646 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.306 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.592 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33652 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.307 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.593 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33649 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.308 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.594 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33657 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.309 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.595 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33622 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.310 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.596 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33585 of 2011
3 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group)
In
Letters Patent Appeal No.311 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.597 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33357 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.312 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.598 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33371 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.313 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.599 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33375 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.314 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.600 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33369 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.315 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.601 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33597 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.316 of 2011
With
4 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group) Civil Application No.602 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33592 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.317 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.603 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33589 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.318 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.604 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33355 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.319 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.605 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33578 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.320 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.606 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33553 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.321 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.607 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33377 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.322 of 2011
5 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group)
With
Civil Application No.608 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33587 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.323 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.609 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33567 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.324 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.610 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33572 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.325 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.611 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33356 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.326 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.612 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33362 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.327 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.613 of 2012 In
6 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group) Review Application Stamp No.33546 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.328 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.614 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33624 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.329 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.615 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33627 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.330 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.616 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33630 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.331 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.617 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33639 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.332 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.618 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33635 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.333 of 2011
7 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group)
With
Civil Application No.619 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33633 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.334 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.620 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33602 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.335 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.622 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33607 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.336 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.623 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33605 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.337 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.624 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33600 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.338 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.625 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33594 of 2011
8 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group)
In
Letters Patent Appeal No.339 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.626 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33514 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.340 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.627 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33360 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.341 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.628 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33366 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.342 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.629 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33429 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.343 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.630 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33413 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.344 of 2011
With
9 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group) Civil Application No.631 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33387 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.345 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.632 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33389 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.346 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.633 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33397 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.347 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.635 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33580 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.348 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.637 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33582 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.349 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.638 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33611 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.350 of 2011
10 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group)
With
Civil Application No.639 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33613 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.351 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.640 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33617 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.370 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.641 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33615 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.352 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.642 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33416 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.353 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.643 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33408 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.354 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.644 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33403 of 2011
11 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group) In
Letters Patent Appeal No.355 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.646 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33399 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.356 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.647 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33405 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.357 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.649 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33401 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.358 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.650 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33410 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.359 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.651 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33654 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.360 of 2011
With
12 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group) Civil Application No.652 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33538 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.361 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.653 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33570 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.362 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.654 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33564 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.363 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.655 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33575 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.364 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.656 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33544 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.365 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.657 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33548 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No.366 of 2011
13 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group)
With
Civil Application No.659 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33551 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.367 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.660 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33542 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.368 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.661 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33619 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.369 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.663 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33511 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.371 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.664 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33561 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.372 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.665 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33557 of 2011
14 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group) In
Letters Patent Appeal No.373 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.666 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33380 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.374 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.667 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33421 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.375 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.668 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33382 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.376 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.669 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33385 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.377 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.670 of 2012 In
Review Application Stamp No.33424 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.378 of 2011
With
15 CA 587 of 2012 (79 group)
Civil Application No.671 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33412 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.379 of 2011
With
Civil Application No.673 of 2012 In Review Application Stamp No.33419 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No.380 of 2011
Shri. R.V. Ghuge, Advocate for applicant. Shri. U.R. Awate, Advocate, holding for Shri. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for respondents.
CORAM: NARESH H PATIL & T.V. NALAWADE, JJ. DATE 19th JANUARY 2012
PER COURT :
Sd/- Sd/- (T.V. NALAWADE, J.) (NARESH H PATIL, J.) rsl
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing review applications requires condonation.
Whether all pending civil applications for condonation of delay can be allowed together.
Bajaj Auto Limited
Bhausaheb Gopinath Janadhar
NARESH H PATIL
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
