The High Court of Bombay disposed of a Public Interest Litigation as not pressed because the counsel for the petitioner stated the dispute between the petitioner and respondent Nos. 4 and 5 had been settled.
Disposed of as not pressed due to settlement of dispute between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17.pil.3.10.doc
jdk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PIL NO. 3 OF 2010
Adivasi Manglam Krishi Vikas Samajik Sansthan
..Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. P.R.Yadav for Petitioner Mr. S.N.Patil AGP for Respondent nos. 3,7 & 8 Mr. V.S.Sawant i/b Kusum Kumar Kaushik for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5
CORAM : D.D.SINHA AND SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 13, 2012.
P.C.:
between the petitioner and respondent nos. 4 and 5 has been settled and therefore, the petitioner does not want to press the present P.I.L. In the circumstances, P.I.L. is disposed of as not pressed.
[ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [ D.D.SINHA, J. ]
kandarkar
Pg 1 of 1
Adivasi Manglam Krishi Vikas Samajik Sansthan
The State of Maharashtra
D.D.SINHA
SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
