This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL125_12.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.125 OF 2012
Madan Damale … Petitioner Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Raigad and others ... Respondents
Ms Ashwini Takalkar for the Petitioner. Mr. C. R. Sonawane, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. A. BOBDE & R. G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 23RD AUGUST, 2012
P.C.:
Ms Takalkar, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to take appropriate action under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(R. G. KETKAR, J.)
(S. A. BOBDE, J.)
Minal Parab
1/1
Madan Damale
The Superintendent of Police, Raigad and others
S. A. Bobde
R. G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
