Disposed
Jayant Khalatkar v. M.S.R.D.C. and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/104/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL104.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.104 OF 2011
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Ms Priyanka Vegad for the petitioner. Mr.R.A.Dada, Senior Advocate, with Mr.P.P.Chawan, Mr.F. Lakdawala and Mr.K.Shah i/b.Little & Co., for respondent no.1. Mr.N.P.Deshpande, A.G.P. for resp.nos.2 to 4. Mr.F.E.Devitre, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Rajiv Kumar, Senior Advocate, and D.Y.Chitnis i/b. Deepak Chitnis Chiparikar & Co., for resp.no.5.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 09, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respective respondents.
1/2
PIL104.11
this Court vide order dated February 7&9, 2012. Present PIL No.104 of 2011 is also disposed of for the reasons stated in the order dated February 7&9, 2012 passed by us in PIL No.206 of 2010.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Suundaresan
2/2
D.D. Sinha
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court