The Court disposed of a Civil Application moved by the State to modify or vacate an interim order. It expedited the hearing of the underlying Writ on merits but held prima facie that no case is made out for vacating interim relief.
Civil Application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2675 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9011 OF 2007
The Joint Commissioner, Kokan Division, Food & Drugs Administration & Ors .. Applicants
Vs
M/s. Micro Orthocare & Ors .. Respondents
Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, AGP for the Applicants
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 8th FEBRUARY, 2012.
P.C.:
1. Heard learned AGP for the Applicants.
3. Considered the contentions canvassed by the learned AGP for the Applicants and provisions of Section 3(b) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Taking into consideration the challenge raised to the Notification as well as the issue involved, it will be appropriate to hear the petition itself on merits and hence, we expedite hearing of the Writ Petition. However, prima facie, we are of the view that no case is made out for vacating interim
1/2
relief.
4. Civil Application is disposed of.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ]
[ D. D. SINHA, J ]
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim order passed on 23rd January 2008 requires modification or vacating.
Whether a case is made out for vacating interim relief prima facie.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Joint Commissioner, Kokan Division, Food & Drugs Administration & Ors
M/s. Micro Orthocare & Ors
D. D. SINHA
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
