This was a writ petition seeking a direction to the Passport Officer to decide a renewal application within four weeks. The court accepted the respondent's undertaking and disposed of the petition without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sk
wp6849.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.6849 OF 2011 Mrs.Shailaja Dilip Joshi : Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. : Respondents
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr.Sandesh Deshpande for the petitioner. Ms M.P.Thakur, A.G.P. for respondent no.1. Ms A.S.Pai, `A’ panel Senior Counsel for respondent no.2.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA &
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 21, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respective respondents.
the respondent no.2 to decide the application dated 29.7.2008 filed by the petitioner for renewal of her passport. Ms Pai, the learned
1/2
sk
wp6849.11
counsel for the respondent no.2, on
instructions from Mr.S.N.Gharat, Asstt. Passport Officer (Policy), has made a statement that the application of the petitioner dated 29.7.2008 for renewal of her passport shall be considered in accordance with law and procedure applicable in this regard within four weeks, provided the petitioner fulfills all the requirements and conditions.
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Suundaresan
2/2
Mrs.Shailaja Dilip Joshi
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent no.2
D.D. SINHA
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
