This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 280 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 493 OF 2008
RATNAKAR PARAB AND 5 ORS., ... Applicants Versus AGNELO D'SOUZA AND 9 ORS., ... Respondents
... Respondents
Mr. P. H. Parab, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. V. Braganza, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. A. N. S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Mr. V. Rodrigues, Additional Government Advocate for respondent nos. 4 and 7.
Mr. S. R. Rivonkar, Advocate for respondent no.6.
Coram:A. P. LAVANDE & U. V. BAKRE, JJ. Date:3rd April, 2012
P.C.
Mr. Nadkarni, learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 and 7 states that police are investigating the crime and will take appropriate steps in accordance with law. In view of the statement made by learned Advocate General, application stands disposed of.
A. P. LAVANDE, J.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
vn
RATNAKAR PARAB
AGNELO D'SOUZA
A. P. LAVANDE
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
