The High Court of Bombay disposed of an ongoing Criminal Public Interest Litigation and two associated criminal applications after the core grievances were addressed by respondents and no further relief was needed.
Criminal Public Interest Litigation and associated Criminal Application Nos. 21 of 2012 and 24 of 2012 were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
CRPIL-49-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.49 OF 2011 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2012 AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2012
Shakil Meer Khan & Anr.
… Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. R.B. Jaiswal for the Petitioners.
Mrs. M.M. Deshmukh, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Sandeep K. Shinde for Respondent No.2.
Mr. A.G. Damle for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE & R.G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 10TH OCTOBER, 2012.
P.C. :
1/3
Dixit
CRPIL-49-11
the concerned Court and the matter is proceeding in accordance with law. The statement is accepted. Mr. Jaiswal, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, seeks a copy of the Charge-Sheet. The Respondents shall furnish such a copy if it is available or Mr. Jaiswal may obtain it from the Court. As far as the second grievance is concerned, Mr. Damle, the learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.3-Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa, states that cognizance has been taken of the alleged misconduct of Ms. Manisha Mhase, Advocate, and Mr. Sunil Shirole, Advocate. The learned Counsel further states that the enquiry will be completed in accordance with law within a period of one year from today.
2/3
Dixit
CRPIL-49-11
3/3
Shakil Meer Khan & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
S.A. Bobde
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
