This order allowed a civil application for intervention to join a suit by consent. The court disposed of the procedural matter without substantive findings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dixit
CAW-2332-12==
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2332 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5699 OF 2012
Bharat Dadu Dubule … Applicant/Intervenor And Vaibhav Vasudeo Patil & Ors. … Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Vineet Naik, Sr. Advocate, a/w. Mr. S.R. Kulkarni for the Applicant/Intervenor.
Mr. Ruturaj Pawar, i/b. Mr. S.S. Patwardhan, for the Original Petitioners.
Mr. Sameer Patil, A.G.P., for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
Mr. V.R. Mankapure for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE &
R.G. KETKAR, JJ.
DATE : 10TH OCTOBER, 2012.
P.C. :
[ R.G. KETKAR , J.] [ S.A. BOBDE , J.]
1/1
Bharat Dadu Dubule
S.A. BOBDE
R.G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
