Writ petition wherein petitioners sought direction for response to their application and revised plans. Court directed respondents to consider the proposal within three months. Petition disposed of.
Direction to respondent corporations to consider the proposal and take a decision within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP1636_12.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1636 OF 2012
M/s. Patel Developers and others Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others
…Petitioners
…Respondents
Mr. Shailesh Shah, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms Shruti Desai i/b. M/s. Shruti Desai and Company for Petitioners. Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. T. H. Puranik for Respondents-Corporation.
CORAM : S. A. BOBDE & R. G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE : 9TH OCTOBER, 2012
P.C.:
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, by consent of the parties.
1/2
WP1636_12.sxw
Minal Parab
2/2
M/s. Patel Developers and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
S. A. BOBDE
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
