Disposed
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corp. v. N C Shaikh
Bombay HCCRA/124/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cra124.11
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2011
[The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation vs.
N.C. Shaikh.]
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s
orders
Mr. G.B. Rajale, Advocate for applicant.
Mrs. S.D. Tambat (Dhumal), Advocate for
respondent sole.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J.
DATE : 6TH JULY, 2012
PER COURT :
Heard.
2. The learned Counsel for the applicant
has tendered across the bar the letter
written by the applicant stating therein
that, the controversy involved in this
revision application, has been amicably
settled between the parties. The said
letter is taken on record and marked as
2 cra124.11 “X” for identification purpose. 3. In the light of above, nothing further survives for consideration in this Civil Revision Application, same stands disposed of accordingly. [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
sut/JULY12
THE MAHARASHTRA KRISHNA VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
N.C. SAIKH
S.S. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court