Disposed
Manohar Laxman Yadav v. Vijay @ Jaising Vijay Sonawane and Ors.
Bombay HCCA/833/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
940 ca.833.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar’s orders
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 833 OF 2012
,In WP/4129/2011
MANOHAR LAXMAN YADAV
VERSUS
VIJAY @ JAISING VIJAY SONAWANE AND ORS
Advocate for Applicant : Gaware Niteen V.
Advocate for Respondent No.1 : M S Jagtap.
P.C.
. This civil application is filed for amendment. Yet
notices are to be issued in the main writ petition. No prejudice would be caused to the Respondents if the application for amendment is allowed. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). Necessary amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Civil application stands disposed of.
2 List the writ petition for admission on 13th August, 2012.
ndm
Manohar Laxman Yadav
Vijay @ Jaising Vijay Sonawane and Ors
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court