The court disposed of a contempt petition arising from a writ petition regarding the transfer of the petitioner's pension to an ECS account. The petition was concluded without further orders.
Contempt petition disposed of with no further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30.conpw.11.12 wp.1198.10
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 11 OF 2012
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1198 OF 2010
Bapu Shantaram Jangle -Versus-
..Petitioner
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumbai
& Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. A.L. Gore i/b J.S. Padam for the Petitioner.
Ms. Trupti Puranik for the Respondent – B.M.C.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 16TH MARCH 2012.
P.C.
1 The letter dated 12th March 2012 addressed by the Administrative Officer (School), Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai, Education Department, ‘L’ ward is taken on record and marked ‘X’.
2 The letter states that the petitioner’s pension amount will be transferred to his ECS account from April 2012. It is further ordered that what is stated in the letter shall be complied with failing which it will be open to the petitioner to claim interest. It appears that it was not possible
30.conpw.11.12 wp.1198.10
for the respondents to comply with the order earlier as the ECS account
has not been furnished.
If the plaintiff has any grievance, he is at liberty to adopt appropriate
proceedings for the same.
3 In the circumstances, the Contempt Petition is disposed of with no further orders.
Bapu Shantaram Jangle
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
