A single judge allowed the plaintiff's chamber summons moving to amend the plaint to implead alleged purchasers and a director via a derivative action, directing amendments within four weeks.
The amendments to be carried out within four weeks from today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chs104-12
1
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.104 OF 2012 IN SUIT NO.3021 OF 2011
Surekha P. Paradkar ....Plaintiff V/s. Nisuyash Agro Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ....Defendants And Jyoti Iyer & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Sanjay Jain I/b L.J. Law for the Plaintiff.
Ms.Mamta Sodh i/b Mr.Dinesh Parmar for Defendant Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 19TH MARCH, 2012.
P.C. :-
chs104-12
2
There can be no objection to the same either.
absolute in terms of prayer (a). The amendments to be carried out within four weeks from today. This order is without prejudice to the pending interlocutory applications and orders.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the plaintiff's prayer for impleading additional parties and amending the plaint should be allowed.
Surekha P. Paradkar
Nisuyash Agro Pvt. Ltd.
Jyoti Iyer & Ors.
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
