This High Court, having found that disputes between parties were settled, held the contempt petition was not a fit matter for proceedings at this stage and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Contempt petition disposed of based on settlement of disputes between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2.conp.70.09.s.1600.2009
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 70 OF 2009
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2233 OF 2009 IN
SUIT NO. 1600 OF 2009
Rajinder Kumar Sehgal & Anr.
..Petitioners
-Versus-
Lalchand Arya & Ors.
..Contemnors/ Respondents
Mr.Shrinivas Bobde a/w. Mr.Rohan Dakshini i/b Federal & Rashmikant for the Petitioners.
Mr. Aniketh Nair i/b M/s. Hariani & Co. for the Contemnors / Respondents.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J. DATE : 16TH MARCH 2012.
P.C.
1 Apart from the fact that the disputes between the parties have been settled, this is not a fit matter for initiating proceedings for contempt, at least, at this stage.
The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Rajinder Kumar Sehgal & Anr.
Lalchand Arya & Ors.
S.J. Vazifdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
