Disposed
Ashok Govind Lohar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCAW/868/2010
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
dgm IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-caw-868-10.sxw
1
dgm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CAW/ 868/10 IN WRIT PETITION NO.683 OF 2008
Shri Ashok Govind Lohar .... Applicant vs The State of Maharashtra and ors. .... Respondents
Mr. S.S. Pakale for the Applicant.
Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for respondents 1 to 3.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : September 06, 2012
P.C.:
Considering the averments made and the reason so mentioned, in my view, a case is made, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayers (a) and (b). No order as to costs.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Shri Ashok Govind Lohar
The State of Maharashtra
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court