Single-judge order granting a writ application where the court found the case was made out and the impugned order was passed without the respondent appearing. Application disposed of allowing prayers (a) and (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-caw-1470-12.sxw
dgm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CAW/1470/12 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2858 OF 2010
Ram Bapushaheb Koli .... Applicant vs Champarai Ganpati Nirmale .... Respondent
Ms. Pavitra Manesh i/by Mr.M.S.Topkar for the Applicant. None for respondent.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : September 06, 2012
P.C.:
Considering the averments made and as case is made out and
the order was passed when none appeared for the Respondent, even otherwise, I am inclined to grant this Application in terms of prayers (a) and (b). Order accordingly. The Petitioner to take steps to serve
the Respondents within six weeks from today.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ application should be granted given the case is made out assuming the order was passed without the respondent appearing.
Ram Bapushaheb Koli
Champarai Ganpati Nirmale
Anoop V. Mota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
