The High Court of Mumbai disposed of a writ petition where the respondent stated the complaint was already decided post-remand on 29.06.2010. No substantive points were weighed.
The petition was disposed of as nothing survived in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
55-4708-12.sxw
spb/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4708 OF 2012
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation ... Petitioner. V/s. Shri S.L. Jadhav ... Respondent.
Mr. C.M. Lokesh i/by G.S.Hegde & Associates for the Petitioner.
Mr. Suhas Inamdar for the Respondent.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : 05TH SEPTEMBER, 2012
P.C. :
The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent makes a statement that after remand the Complaint itself has been disposed of by the order dated 29.06.2010. Therefore, there is nothing survives in this Petition. The Petition is disposed of as such. All points are kept open. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to apply for the modification of the order, if any.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J)
1/1
Borey
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
Shri S.L. Jadhav
Anoop V. Moxhta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
