The court granted the petitioners' request to withdraw Civil Application No.276 of 2012 and Writ Petition No.9884 of 2010, citing a settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sk
1
caw276.12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.276 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9884 OF 2010 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.9884 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Ms T. Khatri i/b. Mr.Sandesh Patil for the petitioners.
Ms M.P.Thakur, A.G.P. for resp. nos.1 to 5. Mr.S.R.Rongne with Mr.Karan Thorat for resp. nos.6 & 8.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : MARCH 06, 2012.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioners and the learned counsel for the respective respondents.
for the petitioners that the dispute between the parties is settled and, therefore, she seeks permission to withdraw Civil Application No. 276 of 2012 as well as Writ Petition No.9884
of 2010. Counsel for the respondent nos.6 and
sk
2
caw276.12
8, for want of instructions, is unable to state anything in this regard. Be that as it may, since the counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Civil Application as well as the Writ Petition in view of some settlement arrived at, there is no reason for us not to grant the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
PETITIONERS
RESPONDENTS NOS.1 TO 5
RESPONDENTS NOS.6 AND 8
D.D. SINHA
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
